Bike Routing, Tricycles, and the Cinema

When my family gets together we like to see movies and ride our trikes. Sometimes we combine the two, assaulting the trails north of Denver with as many as five trikes hell-bent on making it to the movie on time. We take advantage of some excellent bike paths to avoid automobile traffic in a very congested part of town, but I have to admit I’d be hard pressed to find my own way. It takes a local guide with tons of experience riding in the area to get us through the web of interconnected bike paths. That role falls to my brother Mark and it’s about time he got some help. I’d offer but I don’t want to upset the delicate family dynamic. Better to leave it to Mark so that when we get lost I can point out his silly mistake with righteous indignation. Recently I’ve been exploring some technology that might help us avoid family counseling. Spoiler alert: it isn’t Google Maps.

By way of example, I offer our ride to Cinnebarre Thornton Town Center Theaters. It’s interesting because it traverses a congested part of town with many route possibilities that run the gamut from busy multi-lane roads to meandering multi-use trails. Here is the bike routing advice offered up by various map platforms. Bing Maps is conspicuously absent because it doesn’t know what a bike is.

image

Google Maps

image

Here Maps

All but one of the platforms routes cyclists on Washington Street, bad advice for any but the most experienced vehicular cyclist. Here Maps at least provides some alternatives, but none for the Washington Street problem. Google and Here Maps use their own proprietary map data whereas Mapquest uses Open Street Maps (OSM), but MapQuest’s routing is no better.

Compare that to Mapzen’s results, also using OSM. Mapzen completely avoids Washington Street and uses the complete section of greenway that runs parallel to I-25. As far as I can tell this is exactly the route that we’ve painstakingly discovered through trial-and-error, now achievable with a single query to the Mapzen routing engine. OSM cycling data is at least on par with Google’s but it’s Mapzen’s routing engine that makes the difference in this example, piecing together Signal Ditch Trail, Farmers Highline Canal Trail, and the Greenway to provide a route that is mostly on bike path and never on a busy street. It adds about a half mile over a more direct route but for my family this is a welcome tradeoff. Mapzen calls this the low stress routing option.

Low stress is only the beginning—Mapzen’s routing engine offers unprecedented control. Low stress routing is achieved by setting two key parameters, use_roads and use_hills, to their smallest values in a range from 0 to 1. If you’re comfortable riding in traffic, choose a higher value for use_roads. Routes similar to the other platforms can be achieved by simply increasing this setting. Changing the use_hills setting doesn’t do much on this route because it’s pretty flat, but it makes a huge difference in the Boise foothills where I ride a lot.

Mapzen has clearly given a lot of thought to bike routing and you can read about it here and here. In the first link they talk about testing their low stress option on “The Wiggle” in San Francisco. I can relate—my daughter and I negotiated The Wiggle on our cross-country ride a few years ago. We had to use local knowledge from friendly cyclists. Not a bad way to travel but an accurate route on my phone sure would have been nice.

The combination of Mapzen’s routing engine and OSM’s map data is a game changer for bike routing. I didn’t have to edit the map data to achieve the routing shown in this example, evidence that OSM map data is already quite good. Recently I’ve edited the map back home in Boise which shows how easy it is to fix the data when necessary. With these changes and the Mapzen routing I can now generate routes that match what casual cyclists actually use in Boise. I’ve never been able to do that before.

I created a test map that lets you play with Mapzen routing—check it out and see how it does with your favorite routes. Or use it to find new, better routes. If you find routing problems it’s likely due to missing or misrepresented roads: edit the map data.

Disclaimer: The test map is a quick experiment, not a product. Take it easy with those sliders at the top, sliding too quickly will cause a (recoverable) route error. And don’t view it with Microsoft Edge, that browser still doesn’t do well with HTML5. I tested with Google Chrome on a desktop (not a phone).

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s